Username:
Password:
Log me on automatically each visit
 
 
It is currently Thu Mar 28, 2024 3:57 pm
Post a new topic Post a reply  [ 4 posts ]   
Author Message
PostPosted: Fri Feb 17, 2017 11:21 am 
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Wed May 27, 2015 10:20 am
Posts: 515
This is a new formulation for MMS (28% sodium chorlite) which may be superior in some cases to the original Jim Humble's MMS formula. View the actual process at:





http://youtu.be/-t2V7NOsnJM





To summarize this new process:

1) Mix 50cc of 28% sodium chlorite and 50cc of 50% citric acid in a glass (preferred over plastic) bottle which turns into a standard MMS solution (dark brown).

2) run a plastic tube from the MMS bottle over and into the bottom of 500 ml of an ice cold distilled water solution though the video suggests saline.

3) place hot (not boiling) water in a bath container and then place the MMS solution bottle in that hot bath to promote rapid generation of Chorline Dioxide gas.

4) let it generate for approx 30 minutes or until the gas stops bubbling through the tube into the cold (11* C or colder) distilled water solution. Both solutions will reach a similar light yellow color when it is about finished.

1cc of CDS = 3 drops of MMS

This is a way to formulate a weaker solution of MMS without having an acid in solution.

It is tasteless and much easier to tolerate than MMS.

Store in dark and refrigeration.

Jim Humbler writes:

Quote:
CDS can be made using distilled water, just plain drinking water, or saline solution purchased as an Intravenous solution. I PREFER DISTILLED WATER. If you use ice water with ice on the outside of the CDS container that you are making the temperature of the CDS will be about 40 degree F. At that temperature once that solution (CDS) is saturated then 1 CC or 1 ml will equal a 3 drop dose when added to 4 ounces (1/2 glass) of water.

As far as intravenous use is concerned only one test has been made so far and that was successful, but because only one test so far you must realize that you are on your own as far as intravenous is concerned. Muscle injection has been tried a few times only. It seems to be painful for only a minute or two and then the pain seems to reduce. We did 1 CC inter muscle which equals a 3 drop dose. But we have not finished the research.




To make a 28% MMS sodium chlorite solution from commonly sold 80% Sodium Chlorite Technical Grade powder, do the following. First, let me correct a common misconception here about the supposedly 28% strength of MMS. In reality, it is really 22.4% Sodium Chlorite. Not that it really makes a lot of difference in the general scheme of therapeutics. This discrepancy occurs because MMS is made from an 80% technical grade of Sodium Chlorite and Jim Humble really did not take this into consideration.

Ingredients mixed for a final 28% MMS (22.4%) Solution:

Mix 28 grams of 80% Sodium Chlorite into enough distilled water to get final volume of 100 ml.

Mix 70 grams of 80% sodium chlorite into enough distilled water to get a final volume of 250 ml.

Mix 140 grams of 80% powder into enough distilled water for a final volume of 500 ml.

Mix 280 grams of 80% powder into enough distilled water for a final volume of 1 liter (1000 ml).
------------------------

To make 50 cc or ml of 28% solution:

approx 14 grams of 80% powder in 44 ml of distilled water

----------------------

To make a percentage solution, one would add 28 grams of solute (sodium chlorite) to make 100 ml of solution. This will give a 28% solution. Note, one must first weight out the solute and then add enough water to make the target volume as the solute will itself take up some volume on its own.

The formula for a percentage solution is

Drug weight (X) / finished solution = % strength / 100

Thus, to make100 ml of 28% of sodium chlorite, your formula would be:

X / 100 ml = 28% / 100

X = 100 x 28 / 100

X = 2800 / 100

X = 28 grams to make 100 ml of solution by adding only enough water to make 100 ml

--------------------------------------

A setup which will produce a low concentration (<1000ppm) chemically pure chlorine dioxide solutions for use as instrument standard or for studies where the possibility of any chlorine contamination must be avoided.



Attachment:
file.jpg





The reaction flask and gas scrubbing tower is filled with 500 ml of approx 2.5% sodium chlorite solution. Place 50 ml of 10% sulfuric acid solution into the reaction flask, 5-10 ml at one time). The reagent bottle in the ice bath is filled with 500-750 ml of deionized water.

Reaction in neutral or alkaline conditions will result in Chlorine Dioxide forming chlorite ion as by-product. Chlorite is the major inorganic by-product of the reaction of chlorine dioxide in water. Usually, the amount of chlorite formed will be 40-60% of the amount of chlorine dioxide which has reacted. For example, if 1.00 ppm of chlorine dioxide is added to water and 10 minutes later, 0.60 ppm remains as a residual, 0.40 ppm has therefore reacted. We can expect the chlorite to be 0.16 - 0.24 ppm

The scrubbing tower above is designed to remove free chlorine from the final CDS fluid. You possibly could only use MMS 1/4 strngth for the scrubber, and one only need senough volume to bubble through.



=======================================================================




This is a drawing of a CDS setup made by Steve from the MMS blog. It should produce CDS at around 3000ppm:


Attachment:
file-1.jpg





======================================================================



My version of a CDS generator:



Attachment:
file-2.jpg



I used 200 ml of 28% sodium Chlorite in the reaction flask with 60cc of 10% HCl acid in the syringe which I release 10cc at a time throughout the process. In the scrubber flask, I placed 400ml of 14% sodium chlorite, in the reagent flask, 2000 ml of distilled chilled water and finally in the exhaust scrubber flask, 300ml of a sodium thiosulfate solution. The air supply is hooked up to a small tank air compressor and I heat with a used lab hotplate/stirrer. In the reaction flask is inserted a common wired remote food type of thermometer in which I kept the temp at around 160*F.

My first batch of CDS (2 liters of CDS from 200ml of MMS and 60cc of HCL acid) seemed to test out at approx 1000ppm using 500ppm test strips. I diluted my CDS 1:10 for that reading determination.

Remember! Oral dosage levels should be no more than 25-50 ppm of CDS!

A new youtube video on how to make more simply and efficiently a 25ppm CDS in one liter bottle that can be drank all day:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NpM4xZESkNE




Tom's critique on Jim Humble's new method to make 25ppm CDS:



Quote:
Once again Jim Humble demonstrates that he doesn't understand the chemistry that he is dealing with. Also, he is confounding science with his ideas on basic mathematics...

The current MMS protocol calls for taking 3 drops an hour over a period of 8 hours. All of the rest of the world looks at solving the multiplication problem of 8 X 3 and comes up with an answer of 24. Jim Humble comes up with 25. Interesting... :)

OK, he did say that the last drop just "got away from me," so I will give him a little slack. At any rate, drops are very inaccurate and vary widely so he may have noticed a small drop and just wanted to make up for it with the extra drop. If he was interested in accuracy he would use a more exact measurement.

Jim Humble has done repeated testing and has determined in his mind that chlorine dioxide is the active ingredient in MMS. He has done further testing that has determined that a 3 drop dose of MMS is the same as 25 PPM CDS.

Yet when he demonstrates this, he uses enough MMS for 1 liter and produces 2 or more liters of CDS.

If the two were equal, why is he able to produce more CDS with the same amount of chemicals...?

He casually mentions that when you mix MMS you loose some of the chlorine dioxide gas to the air in the 20 seconds of activation, but did you notice the puffing at the top of the bottle? That is chlorine dioxide gas that wasn't dissolved into the water.

Since there are losses both ways, we have to look to science for an explanation.

If you understand the difference between chlorous acid and chlorine dioxide the answer becomes very clear.

When starting with sodium chlorite the amount of chlorine dioxide that can be produced is related to the concentration of chlorite in the sodium chlorite. Keeping in mind the Jim Humble has a goal of 25 PPM let's look at what is available in the various concentrations of sodium chlorite.

A 1% concentration has 10000 PPM available chlorine dioxide. A 2% concentration has 20000 PPM available chlorine dioxide. The 3.5% stabilized oxygen that Jim Humble started out with has 35000 PPM available chlorine dioxide. 5% has 50000 PPM available chlorine dioxide. MMS is 22.4% and has 224000 PPM available chlorine dioxide. Technical grade sodium chlorite powder that is 80% pure has 800000 PPM available chlorine dioxide.

To get the chlorine dioxide out of sodium chlorite activation is used. The amount of chlorine dioxide produced as free chlorine dioxide when using acid activation is related to how low the pH of the sodium chlorite is lowered to. Sodium chlorite in solution is alkaline. If you lower the pH a little, a small amount of the available chlorine dioxide is released as free chlorine dioxide. If you lower the pH a lot, a large amount of the available chlorine dioxide is released as free chlorine dioxide. If you lower the pH far enough all of the available chlorine dioxide is released as free chlorine dioxide. There are some chemical limitation to this, but that is the basic principle.

Unfortunately Jim Humble doesn't understand these basic principles, and because of that lack of understanding he can't pass these basics of chemistry on to his followers. They are simply left to repeat the misinformation he provides them with.

Jim Humble claims that this new method of producing CDS is more efficient. He speculates that he can get 3 days worth of CDS from 1 days worth of MMS. If you look at the science behind this he is getting 3 liters of 25 PPM from a total available chlorine dioxide of about 316000 PPM. That is not impressive efficiency.

That brings us to the difference between chlorous acid and chlorine dioxide dissolved in water. With chlorine dioxide dissolved in water all you have is free chlorine dioxide. With chlorous acid you have available chlorine dioxide and free chlorine dioxide in the solution. In Jim Humbles mind everything is related to free chlorine dioxide. He doesn't understand the difference between available and free chlorine dioxide and how that works in chemistry.

Let's look at his demonstration. We will view this from two different perspectives.

First let's look at what he did. His goal was to produce 1 - 3 liters of water with 25 PPM free chlorine dioxide in it. Let's call it 3 liters.

He mixed up 1 days worth of MMS (which is chlorous acid) and scrubbed the free chlorine dioxide produced into 3 liters of water at a concentration of 25 PPM in each.

If he had followed proper activation procedures, that same amount of chemicals used would produce around 12 liters of 25 PPM CDS.

The second perspective is to look at how much MMS is needed to produce 1 liter of 25 PPM CDS.

This works out to about 1.9 drops.

Now that people have test strips here is a way to demonstrate the difference between chlorous acid and chlorine dioxide dissolved in water.

You will need two glasses. In one mix up your normal 3 drop dose of MMS and add water to make a total of 125 ml. In the other mix up a similar amount of 25 PPM CDS. Put 0.2 grams of Fruit Fresh (ascorbic acid) into each glass and mix. Now measure the amount of free chlorine dioxide in each glass.

The next step involves covering the glasses and letting them sit for 4 hours. After that measure the amount of free chlorine dioxide in each.

The glass that had the CDS in it will show that the free chlorine dioxide has been reduced to zero or near zero, and after 4 hours is still at zero. The glass that had the chlorous acid in it will show zero or near zero free chlorine dioxide after the addition of the Fruit Fresh, but after 4 hours the free chlorine dioxide will have increased to higher than the original 25 PPM.

The science behind this is straight forward. A 3 drop dose of MMS in 125 ml of water has over 300 PPM available chlorine dioxide. Only a small amount of that is released as free chlorine dioxide. The ascorbic acid uses up and reacts with the free chlorine dioxide and it is removed from the solution. However, the chlorous acid reaction continues and more free chlorine dioxide is produced. With CDS there is no available chlorine dioxide. When the ascorbic acid is added, the chlorine dioxide is totally used up and there is nothing to produce more chlorine dioxide.

This is how you take a days worth of MMS and produce multiple days worth of CDS. It is also why CDS is not effective in many cases. Chlorous acid is different than chlorine dioxide dissolved in water.

It is my hope that someday Jim Humble will "discover" chlorous acid and chlorite and will pass that information on...

Tom


You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.

Top
OfflineProfileReply with quote
 
PostPosted: Fri Feb 17, 2017 11:24 am 
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Wed May 27, 2015 10:20 am
Posts: 515
Quote:
How does disinfection by chlorine dioxide work?

Substances of organic nature in bacterial cells react with chlorine dioxide, causing several cellular processes to be interrupted. Chlorine dioxide reacts directly with amino acids and the RNA in the cell. It is not clear whether chlorine dioxide attacks the cell structure or the acids inside the cell. The production of proteins is prevented. Chlorine dioxide affects the cell membrane by changing membrane proteins and fats and by prevention of inhalation.

When bacteria are eliminated, the cell wall is penetrated by chlorine dioxide. Viruses are eliminated in a different way; chlorine dioxide reacts with peptone, a water-soluble substance that originates from hydrolisis of proteins to amino acids. Chlorine dioxide kills viruses by prevention of protein formation. Chlorine dioxide is more effective against viruses than chlorine or ozone.

Can chlorine dioxide be used against protozoan parasites?

Chlorine dioxide is one of a number of disinfectants that are effective against Giardia Lambia and Cryptosporidium parasites, which are found in drinking water and induce diseases called 'giardiasis' and 'cryptosporidiosis'. The best protection against protozoan parasites such as these is disinfection by a combination of ozone and chlorine dioxide.

Can microorganisms become resistant against chlorine dioxide?

Chlorine dioxide as a disinfectant has the advantage that it directly reacts with the cell wall of microorganisms. This reaction is not dependent on reaction time or concentration. In contrast to non-oxidizing disinfectants, chlorine dioxide kills microorganisms even when they are inactive. Therefore the chlorine dioxide concentration needed to effectively kill microorganisms is lower than non-oxidizing disinfectant concentrations. Microorganisms cannot built up any resistance against chlorine dioxide.

Can chlorine dioxide be used against bio film?

Chlorine dioxide remains gaseous in solution. The chlorine dioxide molecule is powerful and has the ability to go through the entire system. Chlorine dioxide can penetrate the slime layers of bacteria, because chlorine dioxide easily dissolves, even in hydrocarbons and emulsions. Chlorine dioxide oxidizes the polysaccharide matrix that keeps the bio film together. During this reaction chlorine dioxide is reduced to chlorite ions. These are divided up into pieces of bio film that remain steady. When the bio film starts to grow again, an acid environment is formed and the chlorite ions are transformed into chlorine dioxide. This chlorine dioxide removes the remaining bio film.





Read more: http://www.lenntech.com/processes/disin ... z1fg5J3XU3




NOTE: the use of CDS in a nebulizer must be very cautiously used. It can cause tissue damage if too high of strength solution is used. Tom writes:

Quote:
The Taiko Pharmaceutical Company in Japan ran some tests using chlorine dioxide gas in the classroom. The result was a reduction of absenteeism due to the flu. The chlorine dioxide gas was able to eliminate the flu virus from the air, thus preventing its spreading from child to child. The concentration was low enough to avoid respiratory irritation.

Here is the paper.

http://vir.sgmjournals.org/content/89/1/60.full.pdf

The key in this is the concentration used. An average person can detect the chlorine dioxide odor when the concentration gets to 0.1 PPM in the air. When you go above that you risk respiratory irritation. They used 0.03 PPM.

As a result of this effort, they now sell a room deodorizer that is sized for an average sized Japanese room. You pour water into the deodorizer, it activates the solution, then to protect against spilling, it gels. You set one of these in each room and it eliminates viruses and other pathogens from the air. Since the concentration is below the threshold of detection, you don't smell a thing.

I used this approach during the swine flu scare. I had elderly people that were afraid to have their grandchildren come over and visit. By using home made deodorizers, they were able to enjoy their grandchildren without having their health compromised. This took several attempts to find the right amount of chemicals to use. The instructions were that if they could detect the odor of chlorine dioxide, they were to open a door and ventilate the room. The concentration was too high.

Unfortunately, measuring the concentration of chlorine dioxide in air is more involved and more expensive than measuring the concentration in water. The simplest way is to realize that if you can just detect the odor of chlorine dioxide, you are over 3 times higher in concentration than you need.

Top
OfflineProfileReply with quote
 
PostPosted: Fri Feb 17, 2017 11:27 am 
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Wed May 27, 2015 10:20 am
Posts: 515
Subject on HCL acid (Muriatic acid) activation of Sodium Chlorite from "Tom"


Quote:
If you had gone to the concrete section of the hardware store you would have found the concentration to be about 32% Muriatic acid.

When you know what dilution you are going for, you can start with either the 14.5% or 32% and end up with the 2.9% concentration you are wanting to work with.

In water purification the goal is to release all of the chlorine dioxide from the sodium chlorite, so hydrochloric acid is used. In food processing the goal is to have chlorous acid knock down the pathogens, and then stick around for awhile to keep them from regrowing. In this application citric acid produces a more effective chlorous acid solution.

When you only partially activate sodium chlorite, as you are doing using the particular concentration of HCl that you are using for activation, you only activate a small amount of the sodium chlorite and it forms a weaker chlorous acid solution.

For example: The chlorous acid that you mix up using your 2.9% HCl concentration is about 7 times weaker in oxidation potential than a similar solution made up using citric acid. In food processing there is no room for error, so testing is done to determine the activation that works the best. Citric acid is used for activation. However, you still have to use the correct amount. The MMS protocol uses 5 times more citric acid than is optimal, and consequently there are issues with the excess citric acid in the solution. This results in a solution with excess citric acid that makes it taste awful, tends to give you an upset stomach, and it has about 30% less effectiveness in oxidation potential than a properly activated solution.

With all the testing that Jim Humble has done, it is unfortunate that he has never "discovered" the most effective ways to activate sodium chlorite.




Other postings from Tom on the MMS group list:

Quote:
MMS is 28% by weight. It is made from 80% pure sodium chlorite. This means
that it is actually 22.4% sodium chlorite.

In parts per million, 22.4% is 0.224 times 1 million. This gives us 224000 PPM.
0.00004% times 1 million is 0.4 PPM. A solution of MMS with a concentration of
0.4 PPM is clear, not yellow, has no odor, and no taste. If you remove a couple
of zeros from that you come up with 400 PPM which is closer to what a 3 drop
dose of MMS ends up at.

Looking at the Food Chemical Codex book again, they give instructions on how to
measure the concentration of the solution.

"Tests

Sodium Chlorite

(21 CFR 173-325; "Determination of Sodium Chlorite: 50 PPM to 1500 PPM," Alcide
Corporation)
Sample For solutions containing 40 to 250 PPM, use a 100 g sample; for those
containing 250 - 500 PPM , use a 50 g sample; for those containing 500 - 1100
PPM, use a 20 g sample; for those containing 1100 - 1500 PPM, use a 15 g sample.
Procedure Transfer the samnple into a tared 250 ml Erlenmeyer flask, and
record the weight to the nearest 0.1 mg. Add a magnetic stirring bar. Add
approximately 2 g of potassium iodide, place the flask over a magnetic stirrer,
and stir until the potassium iodide crystals dissolve (about 1 min). Add 1 ml
of 6 N hydrochloric acid, and stir for 30 s. While continuously stirring,
titrate the liberated iodine with standardized 0.025 N sodium thiosulfate
(Na2S2O3). When most of the brown iodine color has faded, add 2 ml of starch
indicator solution, and titrate to a clear endoint, allowing adequate mixing
time between additions of titrant near the endpoint. Record the volume of
titrant, V, in mnilliliters.
Calculation Calculate the amnoount of Sodium Chlorite, in parts per million,
by the equation

ppm of Sodium Chlorite = (VxNx90.44x1000)/(Wx4)

in which V is the volume, in milliuliters, of titrant; N is the normality of the
sodium thiosulfate titrant; 90.44 is the molecular weight of Sodium Chlorite;
1000 is a conversion factor from milligrams per gram to parts per million; W is
the weight, in grams, of the sample; and 4 is the milliequivalents of sodium
tiosulfate per milliequivalent of Sodium Chlorite."

If you take the time to actually run this test, or use the alternative ion
chromatography method, you will find that a 3 drop dose has a concentration of
about 315 PPM or about 0.14% of the initial concentration of MMS.

Finally, MMS makes chlorous acid with a PH of about 3. Remember that when the
PH of a liquid drops below 7 it is an acid. Mix up a 3 drop dose of MMS
according to the MMS protocol, add half a glass of water (125 ml) and measure
the PH for yourself.

Top
OfflineProfileReply with quote
 
PostPosted: Fri Feb 17, 2017 11:28 am 
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Wed May 27, 2015 10:20 am
Posts: 515
The latest post from Jim Humble (please ignore the church mumbo jumbo as it is there to resist litagation by various health goverment entitiies):

Quote:
Jim Humble Technical Bulletin
NEW HEALTH TECHNOLOGY





I am sure that you have heard about the new Cleansing CDS of the Genesis 2 Church of Health and Healing. But what is it? Is it really something new or is it just old technology given a new name?


CDS is Chlorine Dioxide Gas dissolved in distilled water or reverse osmosis water. Distilled water is pure water with nothing, and Chlorine dioxide gas is the gas with nothing else in it. People have known that chlorine dioxide gas would go into water, but no one really had a use for it until now. Our Bishop Andreas Kalcker in Spain was creating CDS while an American company was also creating the same thing in the USA for a different reason.


The American company was creating it for industrial uses such as treating vegetables before going to market and they have FDA and EPA approval. So they cannot say it is a dangerous poisonous industrial bleach as their approval is for 3000 parts per million which is exactly what Bishop Andreas made. If you want to check this they call it CDG. You can put CDG into a Google search, there is much data about it, it is exactly the same as the Church CDS.


However, since the Church uses the CDS as one of its Sacraments and since the Church is worldwide we are not limited by the FDA or EPA. Where the FDA research might have one or two people test the CDG or even CDS, we have had thousands try it worldwide and we have found some amazing uses for health.


You may or may not know of the Cleansing Water spray of the Church; it is sprayed on the skin to create health regardless of the unhealthy conditions that might be present. l am sure that you understand that it is not our job to treat the various skin diseases of mankind. When you anoint the skin with our spray Sacrament, health is brought to the skin regardless of the unhealthy condition that was there before the anointment.


Well, that is true for most known unhealthy conditions of the skin, but what about really bad stuff such as poisonous spider bites, or sting ray stings? What about extreme fungal conditions of the skin that nothing seems to overcome ?. Our spray Sacrament that has been given to people all over the world is only 320 ppm (parts per million) and it has had phenomenal results. But with the new CDS we are getting even better results from 3000 ppm sprayed directly on the skin.


A bite by an unidentified spider happened to me here in the tropics where my apartment is sitting among the trees. The pain continued no matter what technology I used. The Spray Sacrament at 320 ppm made no difference, the pain continued. I used DMSO, Aztec clay, Zinc Oxide, a mixture of Aztec and Diatomaceous Earth, soaking, and nothing worked. The pain continued. You may know that as long as there is pain, some damage is being done by the poison. That is the purpose of pain, it is nature telling you that damage is continuing, so you must do something about it.


I had found a way to make CDS much stronger than the 3000 ppm that the FDA had approved for the CDG. So one night several days after the spider bite I was unable to sleep because of the pain, and of course, I couldn't go to the hospital as they don't know as much about it as I do. I decided to see just how strong I could make the CDS. After a few hours I had created as solution of CDS that read 25,000 ppm, which is about 8 times the strength of our CDS and the FDA approved CDG. I don't know if it can be made stronger or not as I seemed to reach a plateau at that point.


The pain was now stronger. I said (to myself), OK, this is either going to cure me or kill me. I first dabbed the 25,000 ppm solution directly onto a clean healthy spot of skin. There was no reaction; you see, I had already proven years ago and around the world that chlorine dioxide does not react against healthy skin, but who knows what will happen when you use something 75 times stronger than what has been in use for years. Then I put it directly on the spider bite. In less than 20 seconds the pain was totally gone.


Once again the chlorine dioxide refused to damage healthy skin and it also destroyed the poison present. It took a few days of continued use of the 25,000 ppm solution, but the spider bite was healed. I have treated hundreds of people with spider bites and I have known of people who died when they were treated by medical people. This particular spider bite in question was the worst bite I have seen, and yet the 25,000 ppm CDS killed the poison right away. I guess that you fortunately have not been associated with a lot of spider bites; let me tell you that this was nothing less than amazing that the CDS did that job.


So let me tell you now about how we learned a little bit more about our Cleansing CDS and how the technology of our Church is advancing. In a particular country of Africa where that has a lot of malaria in the jungle we decided to send one of our ministers to treat some local people who were sick with malaria. The problem was that there were also guerilla fighters in the area.


They reluctantly gave us permission to have our minister treat the people. Because the CDS had already brought health to several diabetes cases and some cancer cases the minister was confident of CDS although it had never been used on malaria before. So when he got there he mixed up some strong doses of CDS that he thought would bring health to the malaria victims.


He treated the malaria cases while the guerilla fighters were looking on. Nothing happened. The malaria cases did not get well. The guerillas were going to torture and shoot him as they thought he was using the idea of curing the malaria cases to see and record their camp. However, the women that were with our minister convinced the guerillas he was sincere, but they would not allow him to change the doses to MMS instead of CDS. Instead they sent him away. He was embarrassed to say the least.


What did we learn? We learned that although CDS works better than MMS for direct contact on unhealthy areas of the body, and it does not work for parasites that are inside of cells and cannot be contacted directly. The blood must carry the chlorine dioxide to the parasites and that only happens when the chlorine dioxide goes into the blood.


We have proven that CDS cannot be go into the blood when taking it by mouth, BUT MMS DOES GET INTO THE BLOOD WHEN TAKEN BY MOUTH. We also learned that we must test and prove all our theories before we try to demonstrate them to a bunch of people with guns.


Basically we must not use the Cleansing CDS to attempt to bring health to those who are unhealthy because of parasites. But the fact is, hundreds of thousands of malaria cases have been returned to health when using MMS, the Cleansing Water of the Church. CDS is very effective when it can contact the diseases by direct application to them, but not when it must travel through the digestive system.


Overcoming the bad taste of the Cleansing Water (MMS) and making it more effective.


Some of us cannot stand the bad taste, and thus many have given up trying to be healthy by using Cleansing Water. However, it has been found that the bad taste is mostly due to the pH of the solution. By adjusting the pH just a couple of notches the bad taste disappears. It is a delicate adjustment but you can do it. And an amazing thing is, this pH adjustment makes the Cleansing Water an even more effective anointment.


When the Cleansing Water has the proper pH it travels through the stomach into the intestines more easily as the stomach doesn't have to generate certain fluids to change it thus allowing it to retain more of its power that it would otherwise lose in the journey. From the intestines it can be taken to unhealthy parts of the body by the blood in a more powerful condition.


To make Cleansing Water that overcomes the unpleasant taste for Sacrament 1000 using 3 drops per hour for 8 hours, use either a one quart or a 1 liter glass or plastic container. Mark it so it has 8 equal parts which would actually equal about 4 ounces per marked part. While the container is still clean and dry add 24 drops of Cleansing Water and 24 drops of citric acid (50% citric acid). Wait 20 seconds exactly, and then add the water to the top mark, a full quart or liter.


TO CHANGE THE TASTE OF REGULAR MMS: Use baking soda (Sodium Bicarbonate). Add 1/8th teaspoon of baking soda. You should buy a set of measuring spoons that has a 1/8th teaspoon in the set. This is the amount needed to change the taste. If you are making a drink for protocol 2000 at more drops per hour than three, add 1/3 of a 1/8th teaspoon measure for each additional drop, no more. So that would mean if you are doing a 6 drops dose per hour you would only be using two 1/8th teaspoon measures or 1/4th teaspoon measure total. (Developed by Dr. Ron Neer who donated the information to the Church. He can be contacted at h2oairwateramericas.com.)

Top
OfflineProfileReply with quote
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post a new topic Post a reply  [ 4 posts ] 
 

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests

You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum
 
Search for:
Jump to:  
cron